Saturday, December 1, 2007

SYLLABUS

Introduction
Thurs. January 24

Statement of aims in the course (see course description), remarks on its organization and requirements as well as the choosing of performance groups for the first few weeks.

Pre-reading if possible:
Hamlet, by William Shakespeare
•Alan L. Ackerman, “Visualizing Hamlet’s Ghost: The Spirit of Modern Subjectivity.Theatre Journal 53, no. 1 (2001): 119-144.

Setting the Stage – History, Modernity, the Visible and the Invisible
Tues. January 29th:
Ibsen, Zola and Ghosts

• Styan, J. L., Modern Drama in Theory and Practice, Vol. 1: Realism and Naturalism, pp. 1-37.*#
• Ibsen, Henrik, Ghosts (1881). ^
• Zola, Emile, excerpts from "Naturalism on the Stage (1880) from Documents of Modern Literary Realism.*#
• Zola, Emile, "Preface to Thérèse Raquin" (1873) in Caputi, ed. Eight Modern Plays, pp. 429-432.^

A section of a clip from Les Enfants du Paradis -- we will watch this in class to set up some issues for turn the century theatre vis a vis the boulevard, crime, crowds, and the notion of theatre as bearing witness.

Very strongly recommended:
•Alan L. Ackerman, “Visualizing Hamlet’s Ghost: The Spirit of Modern Subjectivity.Theatre Journal 53, no. 1 (2001): 119-144.

Recommended
• Zola, Emile, Thérèse Raquin (1873) in Houghton, ed., Seeds of Modern Drama, pp. 19-93 (skim, with particular attention to the concluding scene.^
• Leo Braudy , “Zola on Film: The Ambiguities of Naturalism.” Yale French Studies, 42. (1969).
• Lukács, George, excerpt from "The Sociology of Modern Drama." (1909) from Bernard F. Dukore, ed. Dramatic Theory and Criticism, pp. 936-941. #
• Burke, Kenneth, excerpt from "The Container and the Thing Contained" (1945) from The Grammar of Motives, pp. 3-9, 15-16.#

Reading response questions to chose from: Why is Ibsen’s play titled Ghosts? What is the scene that most surprised you in the play and why? Why is Zola upset with theatre and what is his solution? What was experimental, and/or threatening, about naturalism? Can naturalism be threatening today? Why/why not?



Thurs. January 31:
Strindberg, Yeats and More Ghosts

• Strindberg, August, The Ghost Sonata (1907), in Caputi, pp. 183-209 or Cardullo and Knopf pp. 134-160^#
• Yeats, William Butler, excerpt from "The Play, the Player and the Scene" (published 1924), from Aughtry, Landmarks in Modern Drama, pp. 392-395.*
• Yeats, William Butler, At The Hawk's Well (1917) from The Collected Plays of W.B. Yeats. *#
• Yeats, William Butler, Purgatory .*#
Arnold Bocklin's Island of the Dead (1880).

Strongly recommended:
• Styan, J.L. Modern Drama in Theory and Practice, Vol. 2: Symbolism, pages 24-44.*#
• Cardullo and Knopf, Theatre of the Avant-Garde, on Strindberg, pp. 127-133.^#
• Eszgter Szalczer, “Nature’s Dream Play: Modes of Vision and August Strindberg’s Re-Definition of the Theatre.” Theatre Journal 53, no. 1, 2001: 33-52.
• Ibsen, Henrik, The Wild Duck (1884), Caputi pp. 3-77.^#

Reading response questions to chose among: How is The Ghost Sonata different from Ghosts? Could they be staged in similar ways? What are their different demands aesthetically? What do “ghosts” signify across these scripts, in your opinion? Does symbolism have a different orientation to vision and the visible, or to the sensible, material world in general than naturalism (in your opinion, based on the plays from this week and last week)? What is that orientation?


Naturalism and the Need for New Acting

Tuesday, February 5:

Meiningen, Strindberg, and Antoine

• Edward Braun, The Director and the Stage, “Meiningen Court Theatre” (chapter 1) and “Antoine and the Theatre Libre” (chapter 2).^#
• Strindberg, August, excerpt from the “Preface” to Miss Julie (1988) from Dukore, pp. 566-574.*#
• Strindberg, August, Miss Julie (1888), trans. E. M. Sprinchorn (1961) in Houghton, pp. 196-243.^#
• Antoine, André. Excerpt from "The Free Theatre" (1890) from Richard Drain, ed., Twentieth Century Theatre: A Sourcebook, pp. xvii-xviii.*#
• New York Times review of Miss Julie at Antoine’s theatre in Paris.
• Sally Charnow, "Commercial Culture and Modernist Theatre in Fin-de-Siecle Paris: Andre Antoine and the Theatre Libre." Radical History Review 77 (2000), 60-90.

Right: Andre Antoine's mise en scene for Zola's La Terre at Theatre Libre, 1900.

Recommended: John Osborne, The Meiningen Court Theatre, esp. pages 18-53 and 141-173.#

Reading response questions to chose from: What about Meiningen’s approach was so revolutionary? What struck you about Antoine’s direction of Miss Julie? What do you think Strindberg is struggling to express through the play Miss Julie?

Thursday, February 7:
New Acting: Chekhov and Stanislavsky
Above: 1898, Moscow Art Theatre,The Seagull
• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “Stanislavsky and Chekhov” (chapter 5), pp. 59-76.^#
• Chekhov, Anton, The Seagull (1898), trans. Robert W. Corrigan (1962) in Houghton, ed., Seeds of Modern Drama pp. 349-413.^#
• Chekhov, Anton, Letters to Maria Kiseleva and Alexei Suvorin in Caputi, ed., pp. 459-463^#
• Stanislavsky, Constantin. "Inner Impulses and Inner Actions" (1916-1920) from Drain, pp. 253-257*; excerpt from Building a Character, Huxley and Witts, pp. 360-362.*#
• Briusov, Valery, “Against Naturalism in the Theater,” Cardulo and Knopf, pp. 72-76.^#

Highly Recommended: W. B. Worthen, “Chekhov’s Camera: The Rhetoric of Stage Realism” in Modern Drama and the Rhetoric of Theatre, 1992.

Recommended: Stanislavsky, An Actor Prepares, pp.33-53, 263-92; David Richard Jones, "Konstantin Stanislavsky and The Seagull: The Paper Stage" in Great Directors at Work, pp. 15-77. # Styan, Modern Drama, Vol 1, pp. 45-52, 69-9.# Chekhov, The Three Sisters (1901), trans. Elisaveta Fen (1951) in Caputi, ed., pp. 78- 132^; Paul Gray, “Stanislavski and America: A Critical Chronology.” The Drama Review, 9, No. 2 (1964), pp. 21-60.

Naturalism Performance Group to Perform.


The Symbolist Theatre and its Stagings

Tuesday, February 12:
Maeterlinck, Wagner, Appia

L'Apres-midi d'un Faune, Ballet after a poem by Stephane Mallarme, Paris, 1911.
Required Reading:
• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “The Symbolist Theatre” (chapter 3), pp. 59-76.^#
• Daniel Gerould, “The Art of Symbolist Drama” in Doubles, Demons, and Dreamers. Pp. 7-13.
• Paul Marqueritte, Pierrot: Assassin of His Wife, in Doubles, Demons, and Dreamers, edited by Daniel Gerould. 45-50. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publication, l985.
• Maeterlinck, Maurice, Interior (1891) and “The Modern Drama” in Cardullo and Knopf, pp. 41-61.^
• Maeterlinck, Maurice, "The Tragical in Daily Life' (1896) from Dukore, ed., pp. 726-731;
• Friedrich Nietzsche, excerpt from Richard Wagner in Bayreuth (1876).*
•Wagner, Richard, excerpt from "The Art-Work of the Future" (1849), from Dukore, ed., pp. 786-791.*#
• Richard Beacham, “Prologue” from Adolphe Appia: Theatre Artist, 1-7.
• Appia, Adolph, excerpt from Music and the Art of Theatre (1899), pages 10-28; excerpt from "How to Reform our Staging Practices" (1904) from Drain, pp. 237 -239 *#; excerpt from "Actor, Space, Light, Painting (1919) from Michael Huxley and Noel Witts, eds., The Twentieth Century Performance Reader, pp, 21-24.*#


Recommended: Daniel Gerould, "Paul Margueritte and "Pierrot Assassin of His Wife" in
The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 23, No. 1, (1979), pp. 103-112; Styan, J. L. Styan, J. L., Modern Drama, Vol. 2, pp. 1-44#; Cardullo, Bert, “En Garde!: The Theatrical Avant Garde in Historical, Intellectual, and Cultural Context” in Cardullo and Knopf, pp. 1–39^#; Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Idea, published in German in 1819 and influential on Neitzsche and Wagner and modern art; Maeterlinck, The Blind,; Maeterlinck, Pélleas and Mélisande (1892); Appia’s full Music and the Art of the Theatre, translated by Corrigan and Dirks#; Richard C. Beacham, Adolphe Appia, Theatre Artist; Beacham, ed. Adolphe Appia: Essays, Scenarios and Designs; Oscar Wilde, Salomé (1893); Fratisek Deak, Symbolist Theater (1993); Eszgter Szalczer, “Nature’s Dream Play: Modes of Vision and August Strindberg’s Re-Definition of the Theatre.” Theatre Journal 53, no. 1, 2001: 33-52.
















Thursday, February 14:
More Symbolism: Craig, Fuller, Duncan


• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “Edward Gordon Craig” (chapter 6), pp. 77-94.^#
• Craig, Gordon, "The Actor and the Ubermarionette" from On the Art of the Theatre (1907), 54-94*# and excerpt from "Rearrangements" (1915), from Drain, 17-18*#;
Fuller, Loïe, excerpt from "Light and Dance" (1908), from Drain, ed., pp. 245-247.*#
Duncan, Isadora, "Depth," from Drain, pp. 248-249*#
Kandinsky, Wassily, The Yellow Sound (1909) and "On Stage Composition (1912)" in Cardullo and Knopf, pp.169-186^#

Recommended:; J. Michael Walton, ed., Craig on Theatre (1983), Lee Simonson, The Stage is Set (1932); Mordekai Gorelik, New Theatres for Old (1940/1962); Laurence Senelick, Gordon Craig’s Moscow Hamlet; Christopher Innes, Edward Gordon Craig.

Symbolism Performance Group to Perform.
Below: Loïe Fuller dancing.


Tues., February 19: NO CLASS. But please read Alfred Jarry, Ubu Roi (King Ubu), in Cardullo.^ Also read Heiner Müller's Hamletmachine.* This 1977 play is being produced by Brown Theatre and will open on Thursday. We will discuss the play in class on Thursday after the lecture and discussion on Jarry, so please have it read for Thursday. As you will see, it is not without connection to the turn of the century avant-garde!


Thurs. February 21:
Birth of the Avant-Garde -- Alfred Jarry

Guest lecture by Sally Charnow, author of Theatre, Politics, and Markets in Fin-de-Siecle Paris: Staging Modernity.

• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “Alfred Jarry” (chapter 4), pp. 51-59.^#
• Alfred Jarry, "A Letter to Lugne-Poe" (1896), other writings, and Ubu Colonialist from Roger Shattuck and Simon Watson Taylor, ed, Selected Works of Alfred Jarry, pp. 53-60, 67-68, 76-81*#; “Theatre Questions” in Cardullo, pp. 77-125.^
• Roger Shattuck, The Banquet Years: Birth of the Avant-Garde, pages 187-222 (recommended to read on to 252).^#

Above: Program for Ubu Roi, 1896, Théâtre de l'oeuvre




Tuesday, February 26:
Russian Stylized Theatre (Meyerhold’s First Five)


• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “Meyerhold: The First Five Year” (chapter 8).^#
• Meyerhold, “The Search for New Forms” in Meyerhold on Theatre, pp. 17-72.*#^
• Frantisek Deák. “Meyerhold's Staging of "Sister Beatrice." The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1982), pp. 41-50.
• Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Blok, The Puppet Show [or The Fairground Booth]. In Twentieth-Century Russian Plays, pp. 164-175.*
• Selection from Edward Braun, The Theatre of Meyerhold: Revolution on the Stage, “Dr. Dapertutto Reborn” pp. 85-114.#
• Vakhtangov, Eugene, "Fantastic Realism" (1922) from Toby Cole and Helen Krich Chinoy, eds. Directors on Directing, pp. 185-191.*

Recommended,
Shklovsky, Viktor, “Art as Devise” on defamiliarization in The Theory of Prose, (1929), trans. Benjamin Sher (1990; Witkiewitcz, Stanislas Ignacy, from "On a New Type of Play" (1920) in Cardullo and Knopf, pp. 321-326^; Vvedensky, Aleksander, Christmas at the Ivanovs’’ (1938) and Daniil Kharms, Alexander Vvedensky and others, “The Oberiu Manifesto” (1928) with supporting material, in Cardullo and Knopf, pp. 389-420^. Witkiewitcz, The Cuttlefish (1922) in Cardullo and Knopf, pp. 297-320^; Mayakovsky, The Bedbug and other plays; Edward Braun, Meyerhold: A Revolution in Theatre;.# Paul Schmidt, Meyerhold at Work; Bulgakov, The Cabal of Hypocrites or Moliere; Nick Worral, Modernism to Realism on the Soviet Stage: Tairov, Vaktangov, Okhlopov; Robert Russell and Andrew Barrett, ed. Russian Theatre in the Age of Modernism; Nikolai Gorchakov, The Vakhtangov School of Stage Art; Evreinov, Nikolay, e“Introduction to Monodrama,” (1908) from Laurence Senelick, ed., Russian Dramatic Theory from Pushkin to the Symbolists; Kiebuzinska, Revolutionaries in the Theatre.

Thursday, February 28:
Russian Constructivism


• Edward Braun, Director and the Stage, “Meyerhold: Theatre as Propaganda” (chapter 9).^#
• Meyerhold, excerpts from Meyerhold on Theatre, pp. 98-103; 122-128; 204-205.*#^
• Worrall, Nick. “Meyerhold’s Production of The Magnificent Cuckold.The Drama Review (TDR) 17, no. 1, 1973.*
• Okhlopkov, Lee Strasberg, Sidney Kingsley, Molly Haskell, Jay Leyda. “Meyerhold's Bio-Mechanic Exercises (A Photographic Series).” The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 17, No. 1(1973), pp. 113-123.
Actors rehearsing Meyerhold’s biomechanics.
• Alain Piette, Alain. “Crommelynck and Meyerhold: Two Geniuses Meet on the Stage. Modern Drama 39, l996.*
• Gerould, Daniel. “Eisenstein’s Wiseman.” The Drama Review: TDR 18, No. 1, 1974), pp. 71-76.
• Eisenstein, Sergei. “Montage of Attractions.” The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 18, No. 1 (1974), pp. 77-85.
• Golub, Spencer. “Charlie Chaplin: Soviet Icon.” In The Performance of Power: Theatrical Discourse and Politics. Edited by Sue-Ellen Case and Janelle Reinelt. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, l991.*#

Recommended: The Theatre of Meyerhold: Revolution on the Stage, by Edward Braun#; Crommelynck’s play The Magnanimous Cuckold (on order at the Rock); Banu, Georges, “Mei Lanfang : A Case Against and a Model for the Occidental State (1986), from Asian Theatre Journal, 3, 2 pp. 153-171; Alma Law and Mel Gordon, Meyerhold, Eisenstein, and Biomechanics: Actor Training in Revolutionary Russia; Paul Schmidt, “A Director Works with a Playwright: Meyerhold and Mayakovsky.” Educational Theatre Journal, 29, No. 2 (1977), pp. 214-220; Meyerhold, Vsevlod. “Meyerhold Speaks: Observations on Acting and Directing.” The Drama Review: TDR 18, No. 3 (1974), pp. 108-112; Golub, Spencer, The Recurrence of Fate (1994), esp. “The Masking Machine,” pp. 100-122.

Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times (1936) excerpts:


Stylization or Constructivism Performance Group to Perform.


Tuesday, March 4:
Futurism and Dada


• Roselee Goldberg, “Futurism.” From Performance Art, pp. 11-30.*#

• F. T. Marinetti, F.T., excerpt from "The Variety Theatre" (1913), from Drain, pp. 171-174*#
• Prampolini, Enrico, excerpt from "Futurist Scenography" (1915), from Drain, pp. 23-24.*#
• Futurist Plays and Manifestos by Umberto Boccioni, Francesco Cangiullo, Filippo Marinetti, Emilio Settinelli, and Bruno Corra, and commentary in Cardullo, pp. 187-206.^#
• F. T. Marinetti; Francesco Cangiullo; Gianni Calderone; Victoria Nes Kirby, and Michael Kirby. “Marinetti’s Short Plays.” The Drama Review: TDR 17, No. 4 (1973), pp. 113-125.
Highly recommended: Berghaus, Gunter. Avant-Garde Performance: Live Events and Electronic Technologies, pp. 31-47*#;
• Required: Richter, Hans, Dada: Art and Anti-Art, pp. 11-64.^#
• Required Tristan Tzara, The Gas Heart (1920) and "Dada Manifesto"(1918) in Cardullo, pp. 265-289.^#
• Listen to Marie Osmond (I kid you not) performing Hugo Balls’ "Karawane." Listen to other Dada sound events.
• See Hans Richter's short film Ghosts Before Breakfast (below).


Recommended: J.L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol. 2, pp. 51-60, 69-75; Michael Kirby, ed., Futurist Performance (1986)#; Berghaus, Gunter, ed. F. T. Marinetti: Critical Writings#; Mel Gordon, ed., Dada Performance (1987); “Alexis,” “A Visit to the Cabaret Dada” (1920), from Joel Schechter, ed, Popular Theatre: A Sourcebook, (2003), pp. 186-188; Dickerman, Leah and Matthew S. Witkovsky, The Dada Seminars; Annabelle Melzer, Dada and Surrealist Performance (1980/1994) and Latest Rage the Big Drum; Raoul Hausmann (1886-1971)
sound recordings.





Thurs., March 6:
Pirandello and Copeau

• Luigi Pirandello, Six Characters in Search of an Author (1921) in Caputi, pp. 210-256.^#

• J. L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol. 2, pp. 76-84; 91-105.*#




• Luigi Pirandello,"Preface" to Six Characters in Search of an Author (1925) from Aughtry, ed., Landmarks in Modern Drama, pp. 469-478.*
• Jacques Copeau, excerpts (1924-1938) from John Rudlin and Norman H. Paul, eds., Copeau: Texts on Theatre (1990), pp. 111-112, 47-48, 205-208.*#

Image above: Sir Ian McKellan as the Son in Six Characters in 1959, Cambridge.

Questions to ask, perhaps for response papers: If there is a kind of naturalism in this play, what is it and where? Is there a sense that the function of authorship, or authority, is lost? Is there a sense that it can be regained? How? What is the passion driving this play? That is, what is its urgent request of the theatre -- both theatre artists and audience? Is it hopeful in any way?


Futurism and Dada Group to Perform



Tues., March 11:
Artaud’s Theatre of Cruelty



Questions to ask, perhaps for response papers: What does Artaud mean by Cruelty? Does he feel that something is missing from the theatre? What is that something? What does he feel can be done to regain what theatre has lost? Be as specific as possible in your answers. What is the double??? (This last is a conundrum that has inspired ... and frustrated ... and inspired generations of theatre practitioners -- so just do your best to form your own answer).


Below, video excerpt of A.A. Anom Putra performing the solo warrior dance Baris with Gamelan Semara Ratih. At the Colonial exhibition in Paris, Artaud would have seen legong and baris performances, as well as rakshasa and barong "trance" performances (see Nicola Savarese's work on Artaud). This video is likely made with tourists in mind, so perhaps the context of You-tube is modern-day equivalent of Colonial expositions?




On Asian influences on Modern European directors, see the playlist created by Michelle Carriger. Below is an excerpt of a Balinese performance form created explicitly for tourists -- the "Monkey Chant." Artaud would *not* have seen this form, as it had not been invented, but it certainly is heavy on "incantation" -- as if taking a clue from Artaud's imaginary?






Thurs., March 13:
Piscator and Brecht's Emergence

required: Edward Braun, The Director and the Stage, chapter on Piscator, pp. 145-161.
required: Piscator, Erwin, excerpts from The Political Theatre, pp. 20-25;30-36.
*#
highly recommended: Piscator 71-77;81-84; 91-98; 118-123; 185-188; 213-215; 254-69.*#
required: Edward Braun, The Director and the Stage, chapter on Brecht, pp. 162-179.

required: Brecht, Bertolt, Brecht on Theatre, pp. 6-9, 43-51.


Also recommended: Richter, Hans, “Berlin Dada” in Dada: Art and Anti-Art;^ Richard Hulsenbeck on Dada in Germany in Dadas on Art, pp. 45-56; Christopher Innes, Erwin Piscator's Political Theatre: The Development of Modern German Drama; Maria Ley-Piscator, The Piscator Experiment (1967); John Willet, The Theatre of Erwin Piscator: Half a Century of Politics in the Theatre; Oskar Schlemmer, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Farkas Molnár, The Theatre of the Bauhaus (1961);Brecht, Baal (1923), In the Jungle of the Cities (1923), Man Is Man (1926). J. L. Styan, Modern Drama, vol 3, pp. 1-75; 128-149; John Fuegi, Bertolt Brecht: Chaos According to Plan.

Below, Documentary on Lotte Lenya. Latter part has images of some of Brecht's early work and clips of Lenya singing in Three Penny Opera.






Tues., March 18:
Brecht’s Epic Theatre

• Brecht, Bertolt, Brecht on Theatre, pp. 57-62, 84-99, 136-47, 236-38, 179-205. ^#
• Brecht, Bertolt, Mother Courage (1941) in Caputi, ed., pp. 347-402.^#

Special Assignment!!

BE PREPARED to answer the following:
What is literarization
What is the social gest
What is the alienation effect
What is the “not, but”
What is historicization (and why)

Pick a moment in Mother Courage and be prepared to say how you would employ one of the above.

Recommended: Benjamin, Walter, excerpt from "What Is Epic Theater" (1939), from Huxley and Witts, pp. 64-70.* J.L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol 3, pp. 150-184; Denis Calandera, Excerpt from “Karl Vanentine and Bertolt Brecht,” from Joel Schecter, ed., Popular Theatre: A Sourcebook, pp. 188-191, 198-199; David Richard Jones, "Bertolt Brecht and the Couragemodell 1949" in Great Directors at Work, pp. 78-137#; John Willett, The Theatre of Bertolt Brecht (1959); John Fuegi, Bertolt Brecht: Chaos, According to Plan (1987); Brecht's Modellbuchs for Mother Courage and Galileo in Becker.

Below, a section of the film Kulhe Wampe, released in 1932 but immediately banned, about unemployment and left wing politics in the Weimar Republic. The title refers to a tent camp in the countryside near to Berlin. The script was conceived and written by Brecht and he direct some of the film as well. Even if you do not understand German you will understand much of this family scene. There is rampant unemployment. A mother and a father, their son and daughter, try and deal with the situation. You will likely be surprised at the level of naturalism, suggesting that alienated acting can be very subtle or very articulated. Does the watch function rather like the belt buckle in Mother Courage?


In class Piscator or Brecht Performance Group.




Thursday, March 20
– In class midterm.


SPRING BREAK — Read a lot – there is extra reading for Tuesday, April 1.

Tuesday, April 1:
America

• J. L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol 1, pp. 109-147. *#
• J. L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol. 2, pp. 97-121. *#
• Ira A. Levine, excerpt from Left Wing Dramatic Theory in the American Theatre, pp. 151-176.*
• David Krasner, Resistance, Parody, and Double Consciousness in African-American Theatre, 1895-1910. Pp. 15-39; 75-82.^#
• James V. Hatch, "Introduction" From James V. Hatch and Leo Hamalian, eds. Lost Plays of the Harlem Renaissance, 1920-1940, pp. 9-20.*
• W.E.B DuBois,., "Program Note for Krigwa Players: A Little Negro Theatre , Season of 1926," from James V. Hatch and Leo Hamalian, pp. 449-450.*
• Langston Hughes, "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain" (1926) from Hatch and Hamalian, pp. 408-412.*
Eugene O’Neill, The Emperor Jones*
Langston Hughes, The Em-Fuehrer Jones*
Langston Hughes, Limitations of Life *
Listen to Ethel Waters singing: "That Da Da Strain." According to Ubuweb:
"This text, with accompanying recording, makes a curious & little noticed connection to the European Dada activities that immediately preceded it." The European avant-garde was fascinated with jazz --cross-currents made for a two-way street, not often historicized adequately.


Above, a clip from l903 of cake walk performance.


Thursday, April 3:
Existentialism and Theatre, or, Beckett and Absurdism

• J. L. Styan, Modern Drama, Vol 2, pp. 124-137. *#
• Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot. .
• Samuel Beckett, Not I.
• Samuel Beckett, Mp3 of Text for Nothing #8.

Above, scene from Waiting for Godot.

Above, Not I, with Billie Whitelaw. Click here for part 2.

Above, part 1 of Beckett's Play. Here's the link for part 2.

Above, Beckett's Breath, directed by Damian Hirst.
Recommended: Samuel Beckett, Happy Days, in Caputi^#; Arthur Adamov, The Invasion, in Cardullo.^# Other Beckett materials.

Beckett Performance Group to perform




Tuesday, April 8:
Surrealism and Gertrude Stein

• Arnold Aronson, chapter 1, American Avant-Garde Theatre.*#
• Gertrude Stein, The Mother of Us All, to be made available.
• Gertrude Stein, “Plays” in Cardullo, 450-465.*#
• Gertrude Stein, Stein reading “If I Told Him: A Complete Portrait of Picasso.” On Ubuweb:
• Gertrude Stein “Miss Furr and Miss Skeene” from Geography and Plays, rendered by Warren Burt on Ubuweb.

Below: clip of Stein's The World is Round, set to music and workshoped at San Diego's Sledgehammer Theatre, directed by Scott Feldsher.

Recommended: Dr. Faustus Lights the Lights, in Cardullo, 425-449.^# Andre Breton, “First Surrealist Manifesto” in Cardullo, 365-372*#; Betsy Alayne Ryan, Gertrude Stein’s Theatre of the Absolute; Stein’s Tender Buttons. See also Stein on “beginning again” in “Composition as Explanation."

Links:
Surrealist techniques.


Thursday, April 10:
Richard Foreman, Robert Wilson

• Theodore Shank, selections on Robert Wilson and Richard Foreman in American Alternative Theatre, pp. 155-70.*#
• Michael Kirby, “Richard Foreman’s Ontological Hysterica TheaterTDR 17, No. 2 (1973), pp. 5-32.
• Richard Foreman, excerpts on his writing process from Reverberation Machines, pp. 190-221.*#
• Richard Foreman, “Program Notes for Pearls for PigsTDR 42, no 2.
• RECOMMENDED: Richard Foreman’s Strong Medicine on Ubuweb.
• RECOMMENDED: On Robert Wilson see the documentary Absolute Wilson, on reserve at Media Library (ordered in January and hopefully ready).

• Also required: write a play 1 page long using Foreman’s methods. This can be your READING RESPONSE for today.

Performance Group to Perform a la Stein, Foreman, or Wilson.



Tuesday, April 15:
Neo-naturalism: Environmental Theatre to Life/Art to Boal

• Excerpts from Arnold Aronson The History and Theory of Environmental Scenography, 1-14; 29-46; 117-129; 153-64.*#
Highly recommended: Mel Gordon, "Eisenstein's Later Work at the Proletkult."
• Jessica Abbe. “Anne Bogart's Journeys.The Drama Review: TDR, 24, No. 2 (1980), pp. 85-100.
Highly recommended: Steve Nelson, "Redecorating the Fourth Wall: Environmental Theatre Today” [late 20th-century] TDR Vol. 33, 3 (1989), pp. 72-94.
•Linda Montano, excerpts from Art in Everyday Life, Station Hill, NY: Astro Artz.*
•Augusto Boal selection from Theatre of the Oppressed, xiii-x1v, 25-47, 83-85, 120-156. ^#
•Augusto Boal, “Invisible Theatre.TDR 34, No. 3. (1990), pp. 24-34.
Check out large image of Trisha Brown's Roof Piece, l973. Find the performers...
Check out: Improv Everywhere


Above, image from the following year-long art project:

July, 1983

STATEMENT

We, LINDA MONTANO and TEHCHING HSIEH, plan to do a one year performance.

We will stay together for one year and never be alone. We will be in the same room at the same time, when we are inside. We will be tied together at the waist with an 8 foot rope. We will never touch each other during the year.

The performance will begin on July 4, 1983, at 6 p.m., and continue until July 4, 1984, at 6 p. m.

—Linda Montano
—Tehching Hsieh


Recommended:
Arnold Aronson. "Theatres of the Future." Theatre Journal 33, No. 4 (Dec., 1981), pp. 489-503
Tim Etchells. Forced Entertainment Certain Fragments.^#


Thursday, April 17:
Living Theatre to Critical Art Ensemble

• Theodore Shank, selections on the Living Theatre in American Alternative Theatre, pp. 1-37.*#
•Beck, Julian, excerpt from "Storming the Barricades" (1965), from Kenneth H. Brown, The Brig, (1963), pp. 6-35*#
• Malina, Judith, excerpt from "Directing The Brig" (1964), from Brown, The Brig, pp. 83-87.*#
• Interview with Julian Beck (it gets interesting after a few minutes, once Beck is provoked to speak) and other sound materials on Ubuweb.


Below, clip of Paradise Now from l968-69 U.S. tour. Almost impossible to get a sense of the live event from the video, and there is nudity (be forewarned):


Recommended:
The Living Theatre, "Paradise Now: Notes." The Drama Review: TDR 13, No. 3. (1969), pp. 90-107.
• Critical Art Ensemble, Digital Resistance .


Below, clip of Living Theatre's revival of
The Brig, 2007, at Ground Zero (and their theatre) in New York.
Group to Perform neo-naturalism or work inspired by Living Theatre



Tuesday, April 22:
Wooster Group
•David Savran, Breaking the Rules, pp. 9-45; 169-197.*#
•Wooster Group, Emperor Jones, DVD, view at the Media Library.
•Gerald Rabkin, “Is there a Text on this Stage?: Theatre/ Authorship/ Interpretation.” Performing Arts Journal 9, No. 2/3 (1985), pp. 142-159.
RECOMMENDED:
• David Savran. “The Death of the Avantgarde.” TDR: The Drama Review 49, 3 (2005).
•Kermit Dunkelberg. “Confrontation, Simulation, Admiration: The Wooster Group's Poor Theater.” TDR: The Drama Review 49, Number 3 (2005).


Thursday, April 24:
Suzan-Lori Parks -- Repetition and Revision

• Suzan-Lori Parks, Essays -- pages 3-22 in The America Play and Other Works.^#
Read also Parks The America Play, in the same volume.
• Suzan-Lori Parks and the 365 Days/365 Plays Project
• Listen to interview with Parks about 365 Days.

Above: Parks' "Wonderful wonderful" from 365 Days/365 Plays.

Wooster Group Group (or Parks Group) to perform.






Tuesday, April 29:
In class final performances and conclusions. Final exam last 30 minutes of class.

Tuesday, May 6: Final Paper due. Please email paper to Rebecca by 1pm on this day. Put FINAL PAPER in subject heading of your email. Also due: one page self-evaluation of your in-class performance project. If you will need an extension due to other finals, etc., please ask in advance.

Course Description and Requirements

This class aims to provide an introduction to the wide array of theatre and performance forms that developed in 20th-century Europe and North America. We will start with realism and naturalism and work through symbolism, the birth of the so-called avant-garde, constructivism, futurism, dada and surrealism, and myriad other isms and modes. We will study Artaud and Brecht, Beckett and Stein and Hughes and work our way into the latter half of the 20th-century by studying the Wooster Group, Theatre of the Oppressed, Critical Art Ensemble, and other experimental forms. We'll study the so-called death of the avant-garde as well. The focus is on “experimental” forms here – recalling that naturalism, in its day, was revolutionary. Recognizing that the 20th century is pock-marked with a thrall to the “new” in aesthetic production, the syllabus strives to open students’ eyes to the wide varieties of experiments that took place across the century, even as naturalism took a foothold that supported a climb, with Hollywood’s help, upward of 130 years (and still scaling). Some of the offshoots of the 19th-century drive toward naturalism might surprise some students: we will look at life-art for instance, and environmental or site-specific theatre. The aim, throughout, is to grapple with form and style, theory and practice in the wide variety of vibrant performance activity loosely called the “avant-garde.”

Course Requirements

• Attend class regularly. Missing more than two classes may adversely affect your grade.

• See live performances on campus (or anywhere in the world) throughout the semester. Try to go to a live performance event once a week if you can. If you can’t afford costly tickets, there are many many student productions across campus throughout the semester that are free. The point is to see and write about performance as it unfolds live – to experience and think about a live event and what it entails. What is an audience? What is the experience of being with people watching other people perform? What does the lights/darkness feel like? Would it be different if only you were in the audience? How? Is there the assumption of a 4th wall in the production you are seeing? Writing about performance is different than writing about a play text or a historical narrative or a film, etc. To develop your skills, I want you to keep a log where you notice and describe the significance or importance of at least one thing about a live performance that is not the story, plot, or script. I will discuss this “log” below, as it will also contain reading responses.

• Participate in class discussion of the readings. To aid class discussion, you are required to write reading responses. You will keep these responses in a log. The log will be composed of written responses to the reading as well as to descriptions/engagement with performances (see above). Each week, before each class, you will post a log entry on the class discussion board. Each entry should be about 250 words in length. You can choose to post a performance response or a reading response (the reading response must be about the reading for the present class). Each week at least one of your postings should be in response to the reading. I will discuss this further in class. By the end of the semester you should have at least five live performance entries. However, if I feel that you are coming to class not having done the reading, I will request that you use the log (discussion board) only for reading responses. The log will be monitored by the Teaching Assistant for the class, Michelle Carriger. I will add to the syllabus some reading response suggestions for the first few classes so that you can get an idea of what kinds of questions to pose when writing a response. Ultimately, however, you should compose your own question to answer. The log will constitute %15 of your grade.

• Class participation in one short performance piece, devised in a group. Your group will perform the scene (or stage the event) and then take questions about your work. You will need to be prepared to discuss, in front of the class, your choices in putting the scene together, relating those choices to the readings and extra research. This will constitute 15% of your grade.

Midterm and Final. The midterm and final count for %50 percent of your grade

• A final 8 page paper to be chosen from the topics listed under each class heading (or another topic to be framed in consultation with the Professor or T.A.). There are huge number of performance forms and styles and artists we do not cover in this class. You may want to use this paper to explore someone or some style we were not able to cover. Or, you may want go into more depth with something that has interested you that we did explore. This final research paper will constitute 20% of your grade.

Books at Bookstore

Artaud, Antonin. The Theatre and Its Double. Grove Press, 1994. ISBN-10: 0802150306.

Boal, Augusto. Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Theatre Communications Group. English. ISBN-10: 0930452496

Braun, Edward. The Director and the Stage: From Naturalism to Grotowski. New York: A&C Black, 2003. ISBN-10: 0413463001

Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. ISBN-10: 0809005425

Caputi, Anthony, ed. Eight Modern Plays. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991 (1966). ISBN 0393960153

Cardullo, Bert and Robert Knopf. Theatre of the Avant-Garde 1890-1950. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001. ISBN: 0300085265

Critical Art Ensemble. Digital Resistance. New York: Autonomedia (May 1, 2000). ISBN-10: 1570271194

Houghton, Norris, ed. Seeds of Modern Drama. New York: Applause Books 2000 (1963). ISBN 0936839155

Ibsen, Henrik. Four Major Plays. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0192833871

Krasner, David. Resistance, Parody and Double Consciousness in African American Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, l998. ISBN: 0312219253

Parks, Suzan-Lori. The America Play. New York: Theatre Communications Group, l995. ISBN: 1559360925

Richter, Hans. Dada: Art and Anti-Art. Thames & Hudson, 1997. ISBN-10: 0500200394

Savran, David. Breaking the Rules: The Wooster Group. Theatre Communications Group, 1988. ISBN-10: 0930452828.


Shattuck, Roger. The Banquet Years. New York: Vintage Books, l968.


Recommended:

Etchells, Tim. Certain Fragments: Forced Entertainment. New York: Routledge, 1999. ISBN-10: 0415173833

Meyerhold, Vsevlod. Meyerhold on Theatre. New York: Methuen Drama, 1978. ISBN-10: 0413387909



A Packet of Miscellaneous Materials may be ordered at Allegra Copy Center. Selections from this packet are marked with an asterisk (*) in the reading list. Copies of most of these materials will be placed on reserve at the Rockefeller Humanities Reading Room. Some material will also be available in the Becker Library, 2nd Floor of Lyman Hall.

Midterm Study Sheet

Th exam will be partly take home. I will give you the essay portion (choose one essay) on Tuesday March 18 in class and you will bring in your finished essay in on Thursday March 20. That essay should be 750-1500 words in length and include citations (though too much block quoting may be problematic).

In class on Thursday, we will spend 45 minutes on a short answer test. Some sample questions are below. The style of these questions should help you study material over the semester with an eye to toward the types of questions that may be asked.

Please be prepared to write short answers to the following questions:

1. Why is Ibsen’s play titled Ghosts?

2. Zola is frustrated with the theatre that precedes him. Why? What does he call for in a new theatre?

3. Why is the Duke of Saxe Meiningen so often mentioned as essential to Modern Theatre’s development?

4. Who was Andre Antoine and why was he important to modern theatre?

5. Was Chekhov entirely happy with Stanislavsky’s direction of his plays? Say why or why not.

6. What are some signature theatrical techniques of turn-of-the-century symbolism?

7. How are objects and/or environment important to naturalism? Give an example from a play in which they are featured.

8. What did Edward Gordon Craig advocate for the theatre and why?

9. What made Adolphe Appia a revolutionary for the stage?

10. What is “deliberate convention” and how can it be associated with Meyerhold?

11. Why can Meyerhold’s production of The Magnanimous Cuckhold be called constructivist?

12. Why did Ubu Roi cause riots in the theatre?

13. What are some essential aspects of Dada?

14. Can you relate the “anti-art” agenda of Dada to the war (say which war) in any way?

15. I'll ask about Brecht.

16. There may be a question about Copeau.

17. Who is your favorite so far this semester???

etc. etc. etc.

Happy Studying!



ESSAY portion.

Please choose one topic from the topics below and write a 750-1500 word essay in response, due in class on Thursday the 20th. Include citations from class material where appropriate either in the text or as footnotes. Include a works cited list (bibliography) if you do employ citations. (However, remember that too much block quoting can be problematic). Please be sure to put your name on your essay as well as the specific question you are answering. Also, if your topic concerns a play or plays, try and discuss the plays in production whenever possible. That is, do not craft a purely literary essay.

1. It is said that one concern of late 19th- and early 20th-century modernity relates to changing lifestyles brought on by the industrial revolution as well as internal (often violent) political upheavals. Cities were growing in the wake of the industrial revolution, displacing people from the countryside and life was rapidly changing due to new mechanical technologies. Name one or more playwrights or directors who grapple with one or more of these issues in one or more ways. Craft an essay that brings out the playwright or director’s approach to this issue.

2. Compare and contrast Artaud’s call for the theatre with one other theatre theorist, practitioner, playwright, or director we have studied so far. Use specific quotes from each.

3. Compare and contrast Brecht’s theatre with one other theatre theorist, practitioner, playwright, or director we have studied so far. Use specific quotes from each.

4. Compare and contrast naturalism and symbolism as aesthetic practices. Use specific examples from each form drawn from theorists or plays or directors or some combination.

5. Why might one or more of the following deeply theatrical productions nevertheless be called life-like or even “naturalistic” in production: Jarry’s Ubu Roi, any production of Meyerhold, Pirandello’s Six Character’s in Search of an Author (though we didn’t study a particular production you can use the play if you discuss the implications in its staging). How is this “natural” aspect articulated?

6. Craft an essay on the search for authenticity (or "truth") in the modern theatre. Discuss at least two of the following five different approaches to this search: Zola, Yeats, Pirandello, Artaud, Brecht.

7. Craft an essay on Artaud's "Theatre of Cruelty," engaging any aspect of The Theatre and its Double that compels you in some way.

8. Several of the practitioner/theorists we have read this semester call for new approaches to acting. From the actor of the word-tone-poet of Appia, to Craig's Ubermarionette, to Meyerhold's biomechanics, to Artaud's hieroglyphs (the “actor signaling through the flames”) there are calls for greater physical awareness or control. Craft an essay engaging one or more of the above artists in terms of their call for a new actor.

9. Chekhov's The Seagull and Pirandello's Six Characters in Search of an Author both begin with nails. They both start this way, but then arguably diverge. Still, at the level of “family drama” they may be said to share certain similarities. Craft an essay that takes off from the nails to compare and contrast these plays (be sure to address acting or directing or production style required as well, that is, do not write an essay of literary textual criticism about the plays only).

10. Blok's Fairground Booth (sometimes translated The Puppet Show) and Jarry's Ubu Roi (staged as it was at its opening in 1896) might be said to be theatre about theatre. So, for that matter, are The Seagull and Six Characters in Search of an Author. Using examples from one of more of these plays, imagined in production, discuss what meta-theatricality accomplishes in the instances you chose. You might choose to include why the artist you discuss might need meta-theatricality to make his point.

11. August Strindberg's Miss Julie and some of the Futurist plays we read give a pronounced attention to objects. So does Brecht's Mother Courage (think of the belt buckle). Craft an essay about one play or about plays in comparison that explores the place of objects on the stage . How and why are objects foregrounded in these works?

12. Many of the theatre-makers we have studied so far have looked to other cultures to supply what they find lacking in European theatre. Or, in some way cited another culture –such as Jarry’s pseudo Africanisms. Craft an essay discussing how one or more playwright, director, theorist, or art movement looked to the “primitive” or the “exotic” to address the problems he/they perceived in the European theatre. What effect did the citation of the “other” and “other practices” have for the examples you choose?

Good Luck!!!

Final Study Sheet

Select from among the following essay questions to compose the final exam. Select two of these questions and write a 500-750 word essay in response to each.

1. David Krasner writes in Resistance, Parody and Double Consciousness in African American Theatre that many black performers on the American stage at the turn of the 20th century “employed a two-fold strategy in countering white claims of black authenticity: reinscription and reversal.” Compose an essay explaining what reinscription and reversal mean in the context of Krasner’s study. If you have time, also answer the following (though not required): Can this be related in any way to other artists we have studied this semester? If so, how?

2. What, in your opinion, is the effect of Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett as you might imagine it in production? Or, if you prefer, substitute Not I, or Play to write about. Or, craft an essay on some combination of these three texts tackling the question of their effect (as you would imagine it) in production. Are these texts devoid of meaning? Or, perhaps better, what is the relationship of one or more of these play texts to meaning-making?

3. Gertude Stein was highly influential on the theatres that would follow her. Craft an essay on one or more of her ideas. Use either “syncopated time” or “the actual present” as she discusses in “Plays” and link that concept (or those concepts) to some aspect of The Mother of Us All, or If I Told Him: A Complete Portrait of Picasso, or Miss Furr and Miss Skeene.

4. How do you interpret Richard Foreman’s creative process as explicated in Reverberation Machines? What, if anything, do you find “successful” about his method for failure? Craft an essay about his method and feel free to use examples of texts you may have generated exploring his method in the service of explicating his method.

5. Craft an essay imagining some ways in which Richard Foreman may be indebted to Gertrude Stein.

6. Craft an essay imagining some ways in which Robert Wilson may be indebted to one or another of the artists or movements we have studied this semester.

7. How might the Living Theatre, Linda Montano, environmental theatre, or Boal's Invisible Theatre be linked to Zola and early naturalism? Compare and contrast the arguable neo-naturalism of one or more of these theatre or performance practices with Zola, or Stanislavski or Antoine. The opening might be “Both Zola and The Living Theatre stress the importance of the reality of the scene, but…”

8. What has the Wooster Group done to the sanctity of the play script and why? What do you think of their particular mode of montage? Can you imagine a dialog between the Wooster Group and Bertolt Brecht? Does the Wooster group alienate and/or make the familiar strange? Or, would Brecht think they go too far? (there’s no right answer here, by the way, I’m just interested in what you magine Brecht’s take might be on the Wooster Group and vice versa).

9. Suzan-Lori Parks writes in “Elements of Style”:
"Theatre: Jesus. Right from the jump ask yourself: 'Why does this thing I’m writing have to be a play?' The words ‘Why,' 'have' and 'play' are key. If you don’t have an answer then get out of town. No joke. The last thing American theatre needs is another lame play."
Craft an essay that answers the question: Why does Parks’ text The America Play have to be a play? Or, ask this question of anything we’ve studied this semester…

On Local Performances

Students should see as many live performances as possible throughout the semester, keeping a PERFORMANCE LOG in a form of comments added to the Performance Log section on the blog. There, in the form of a comment, mention the performance and date you attended as well as at least one detail of the performance that struck you as memorable. I will discuss this in class. I am not concerned that you only see “20th-century” plays. We are not so far beyond the 20th-century that 21st-century productions of any period play will not have some relevance. Also, it is important when developing skills toward thinking and writing about performance (let alone making it) that you see as much as possible.

Brown University Theatre will be presenting: Hamletmachine by Heiner Müller directed by José Enrique Macián, February 21-24.
Peer Gynt by Henrik Ibsen, directed by John Emigh, March 6-9 & 13-16.
...and Jesus Moonwalks the Mississippi by Marcus Gardley, directed by Patricia Ybarra, April 10-13 & 17-20.
Contact the Brown Box office. Also check out the Dance season listed at the box office website and try your hand writing about dance!

Rites and Reason Theatre has performances throughout the semester.

Student groups across campus offer myriad performances all semester. Check out the performances of Production Workshop, Shakespeare on the Green, Dance’s New Works, Brownbrokers, and any other student performances you can find.


Trinity Repertory Company
will be presenting: Some Things are Private, created by Deborah Salem Smith & Laura Kepley,written by Deborah Salem Smith, February 15 - March 23 and Blithe Spirit by Noel Coward, Directed by Curt Columbus, March 28 - April 27. Also check for announcements of Brown/Trinity productions throughout the semester.


Providence Black Repertory Theatre will present: The Bluest Eye, January 31 - March 9, adapted by Lydia Diamond from the novel by Toni Morrison and directed by Don Mays. Also The Etymology of Bird, April 10 - May 18, by Zakiyyah Alexander, directed by Megan Sandberg-Zakian.

Perishable Theatre will present Sweet Disaster by Charlotte Meehan, directed by Brown's Ken Prestininzi. Previews April 26-28. But other performance events run at Perishable all the time such as “improv jones” and “blood from a turnip” events.

The Gamm Theatre will present The Pillowman by Martin McDonagh
Jan 24-Feb 24; Boston Marriage by David Mamet, Mar 20-Apr 13, and The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, May 15-Jun 15.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Possible Topics for Final Paper

Tuesday, February 5: Meiningen, Strindberg, and Antoine

Possible topics for final paper: The relationship of Zola's play(s) to his novel(s); Melodrama on stage in Europe during the late 19th Century; Delsarte and acting ; The reception of Ghosts and/or A Doll's House in England and America; Ghosts in relation to Ibsen's earlier plays; Ibsen and Freud ; Acting styles used in the late 19th-century European stage; André Antoine and the Free Theatre Movement in France; Marxism and Nationalism in the Germany of Hauptmann; Nietzsche's influence on Ibsen and the Naturalist movement; Darwin’s influence on realism; Otto Brahm and the Frei Buhne; The effect of Ibsen on George Bernard Shaw (see The Quintessence of Ibsenism); Strindberg, women, and late 19th-century gender politics; Displays of “Hysterical Women” in Paris and their effect on theatre and psychoanalysis; Gender politics in the plays of Strindberg's male contemporaries: e.g. Ibsen's Hedda Gabler, Shaw's Man and Superman and Wedekind's Lulu ; Female playwrights and gender politics in the late 19th- and early 20th-centuries; Rachel Crothers’ It’s a Man’s World and Strindberg; Strindberg's reception in Europe and America.

Thursday, February 7: New Acting: Chekhov and Stanislavsky


Possible final paper topics: The Moscow Art Theatre's organization and its artistic agenda during its early years, as well as it’s later development; Stanislavky and Chekhov's working relationship and their positions vis a vis realism as an aesthetic movement; Chekhov's short stories and early plays in relation to his major theatrical works; Chekhov's plays in relation to his predecessors, especially Turgenev and Tolstoy; The later treatment of Chekhov's plays in the Soviet Union; the reception of Stanislavky in America through the Group Theatre; the history of “method acting” and American Psychological Realism (see link to Paul Gray in syllabus).

Tuesday, February 12: Maeterlinck, Wagner Appia

Possible final paper topics: Ruth St. Denis, Ted Shawn, and Delsarte; Mary Wigman in the Theatre; Productions of Maeterlinck's plays; Productions of Strindberg's dream plays; Chekhov and Symbolism; Wilde's Salome in production; Strindberg’s dream plays and their influence on Ingmar Bergman; Emile Jaques-Dalcroze, Eurythmics and Appia; Wagner's Beyreuth and the Modern Theatre


Thursday, February 14: More Symbolism: Craig, Fuller, Duncan

Further topics: Craig's influence as a designer and editor; Craig and Stanislavky and Hamlet at the MAT; Mask magazine: it's advocacy and its impact; Kandinsky as a painter and theatre artist; Loïe Fuller; Isadora Duncan

Thurs. February 21: Birth of the Avant-Garde -- Alfred Jarry

Further topics: Jarry and the persona of Ubu: on and off the stage; Dr. Faustroll, Ionesco and the College of 'Pataphysics’; impact of Jarry on Theatre of the Absurd; Theatre of the Absurd; Expressionism; Grand Guignol.

February 26-28: Russian Constructivism

Paper topics: The actress Vera Komissarzhevskaya; In-depth research on one (or more) of Meyerhold’s early productions; Meyerhold and Alexander Blok; Meyerhold’s Masquerade; Dr. Dapertuttu and Meyerhold; Meyerhold's production of The Inspector General; Bio-Mechanics and Meyerhold's evolving aesthetic; Mayakovsky's Mystery Bouffe and The Bedbug; Mayakovsky’s Mayakovsky: A Tragedy; Vakhtangov as a director; Vakhtangov’s production of Turandot; Witkiewitz, politics, and the project of a “pure theatre”; Michael Chekhov and Acting; Tairov and Constructivism; Okhopkov and Theatrical Space; Bulgakov and Stalin; The crime of "formalism" or “modernism” in the USSR; Soviet Socialist Realism


Tuesday, March 4: Futurism, Dada, Surrealism


Ball, Hennings, Tzara, Dada and the Cabaret Voltaire; Futurist Performances and their reception; André Breton, Surrealism and Politics from the mid-20s; Picasso, Arp and the Cubists in relation to Performance; Surrealism and Gender; Federico García Lorca’s “Impossible Theatre”; Surrealism and Bunuel; Robert Wilson and Surrealism


Thurs., March 6: Pirandello and Copeau

Paper topics: The reception of 6 Characters; Copeau's Theatre School; Copeau and the Vieux Colombier Théâtre; Charles Dullin; Pirandello and Mussolini’s Italy

Tues., March 11: Artaud and His Legacy

Topics: Michel de Ghelderode and Artaud ; Artaud and the Balinese Theatre; Artaud's production of Shelley's The Cenci; Roger Blin and the links between Artaud and Genet; Peter Brook and Charles Marowitz’s Theatre of Cruelty Workshop; Artaud and Grotowski; Artaud and Surrealism

Thurs., March 13: Expressionism, Piscator and Brecht's Emergence


Topics: Reinhardt and Expressionism; Piscator's Production of The Good Soldier Schweik; Piscator and Documentary Theatre; Theatre at the Bauhaus; Expressionism and Brecht; Brecht's Lehrstucke; The reception of The Three Penny Opera; Expressionism in German Cinema

Tues., March 18: Brecht and Epic Theatre

Topics: Brecht and Expressionism; Brecht and the East German government; Brecht's legacy in England; Brecht in the USA; Brecht as director


Tuesday, April 1: America

Possible Report Topics:
The syndicate and American theatrical production
The tradition of Melodrama and American Realism
Ibsen, Strindberg, and America
David Belasco and naturalistic staging: America and the cult of the real
The Provincetown Players in relation to the tradition of realism
Women dramatists at the Provincetown Players and on Broadway
Steele Mackaye and the Delsarte system in America
Realism and Politics in early 20th-century America
The Little Theatre movement
Edison's kinescope, early film and its impact on the tradition of theatrical realism
Vaudeville, minstrelsy, and the musical review in the early 20th century
The staging of Showboat
The controversy over Herne's Margaret Fleming
Theatre and Marxism in the American Depression
The genesis and program of the Federal Theatre Project
The Group Theatre and Stanislavsky
The effect of realism on the American musical comedy
The Screwball Comedy and the Depression
The adaptation and production of Native Son.
Welles, Houseman and the Mercury Theatre
Maxwell Anderson and the theatricality of the Sacco and Vanzetti case.
The writing of Native Son
The audience of the Harlem Renaissance Theatres
Langston Hughes as playwright
W. E. B. DuBois and the stage
The relationship of the plays to the Gospel tradition
Zora Neale Hurston, Hughes and The Mulebone Controversy
Bert Williams, Black Minstrels and the stage
Irish Theatre and the Harlem Renaissance
Women in the Harlem Renaissance and/or Black Theatre Movement
The Black Theatre Movement of the '60s and the Harlem Renaissance
Dubois, Barbara Ann Teer, and the Black National Theatre in Harlem
Langston Hughes, George Houston Bass, and Rites and Reason Theatre
The Free Southern Theater of New Orleans
Paul Carter Harrison and African theatrical traditions


Thursday, April 3: Absurdism and Beckett

Possible topics: Beckett, Joyce, and Proust; Beckett’s Eleutheria and his development as a playwright; Beckett as novelist and the landscape of the plays; Beckett as director; Beckett’s later plays; Endgame and Arrabal’s The Architect and the Emperor of Assyria; Ionesco; Adamov; Albee.

Tuesday, April 8: Stein to Wilson and Foreman
Thursday, April 10 – Neo-naturalism? Environmental Theatre to Life/Art to Boal
Tuesday, April 15-- Wooster Group
Thursday, April 17 -- Living Theatre to Critical Art Ensemble
Tuesday, April 22 -- Forced Entertainment
Thursday, April 24 – Suzan-Lori Parks